Thursday, September 6, 2018

Indonesia’s Olympics 2032 hopes rest on an Asian Games legacy that benefits the people – and it starts with education for all

The feel-good factor over Indonesia’s successful hosting of the Asian Games still flows through the hearts of its citizens and those who attended the festival in Jakarta and Palembang.


The 31 gold medals won by Indonesian athletes, praise for its largely efficient handling of 11,000 athletes and thousands of media and the prospect of an Olympic bid for the 2032 Games is helping to sustain a buzz that has resonated ever since the awe-inspiring opening ceremony at the Gelora Bung Karno Stadium on August 18.
The refrain that echoed across venues and streets on September 2 as visitors said their goodbyes was “See you at the Olympics!”


Indeed, Jakarta showed it was more than capable of managing, facilitating, accrediting and transporting tens of thousands of people as it would need to do to stage an Olympic Games.
The Rio de Janeiro-type set-up in which venues were located in three main clusters around Jakarta is a winning formula, made even better by residents who thronged the thoroughfare leading to the main stadium – which enjoyed a party atmosphere thanks to the shops, food stalls and entertainment offerings lining the road.
While there were complaints that the stadium was mostly empty for the athletics events, thousands milled around outside, many claiming ground-space to have family picnics.
Transporting fans between cluster venues was smooth given the short distances – one could even walk – and the volunteers with their distinctive red tops were there to guide you from the moment you arrived atSoekarno-Hatta International Airport to the time you left.
Even International Olympic Committee president Thomas Bach praised Indonesia, saying: “The IOC really appreciates Indonesia’s candidature for 2032. With the great success of these Asian Games, Indonesia has showed it has all the ingredients to organise Olympic Games in a very successful way.”
However, in a few days, weeks or even months, the excitement will recede, Bach’s elation will be diluted and Jakarta and Palembang will return to normal. Asian Games hoardings will be taken down, the painted facades of inner-city housing will begin to fade and the realities of life will return to the 30,000 volunteers and helpers who will be wondering “what next?”.

The destination of the 2032 Olympics will not be decided in the next few months. The IOC’s usual practice is to vote for a host city seven years in advance. Therefore, Indonesia’s ability to host the biggest sporting event in the world will not depend on the adrenaline-filled confidence of now but on where the country stands in 2025.
Yes, the Asian Games 2018 will be a shining star on its resume but much can happen in the next seven years. By 2025, there would have been two more Olympics Games – Tokyo and Paris – and one Asian Games, in Hangzhou, China. All will be trying to outdo Jakarta.
A strong list of potential rival candidates will also emerge. There is already interest from Germany, Shanghai, Brisbane and even loose talk about a joint bid by Singapore and Malaysia. The Netherlands and Russia have also expressed interest.
Germany’s potential is something never before attempted with the North Rhine-Westphalia state providing 13 host cities, including Düsseldorf, Dortmund, Cologne and Bonn.
For Indonesia to be relevant, it must prove its promised Asian Games legacy – that of people via the development of human capital rather than facilities – is manifest for the world to see when IOC members vote in 2025.
At past Games, cities have been tiresome in their vows to ensure major stadiums and arenas do not become white elephants – most of them failing. Indonesia’s promise is different. They want to invest in human capital and ensure its young, like the enthusiastic volunteers, are tangibly affected by Asian Games.
They need to become leaders of the future Indonesia, in entrepreneurship, education, innovation, politics, sports, faith and other walks of life. Equally important, Indonesia must groom the next generation of volunteers and leaders, which means a faster pace of education reform.
The Indonesian economy is growing, with GDP projected at 5.8 per cent in 2018 compared to 5.1 per cent last year. The government is expected to spend up to US$138 billion in infrastructure by 2025. However, for the country to truly grow, it needs to ensure all its citizens have access to quality education.
In 2002, the government enacted education policy reforms, which the World Bank says is significant in measuring the success of human capital development.
The bank says in a June report that enrolment has grown significantly but student learning remains below that of other Southeast Asian countries. It says 55 per cent of 15-year-olds are functionally illiterate compared to 10 per cent in Vietnam.
While the policies were fundamentally sound, its implementation is less efficient, despite around 20 per cent of the Indonesian government’s budget going to education – among the highest in world.

The government must now make greater efforts to ensure its policies are enforced, such as improving the quality of teachers, more parity between poor and non-poor schools in terms of facilities, teachers and accessibility, and raising awareness about the importance of education.
As the World Bank points out, access to schooling is a crucial cog in building human capital. In 1950, an average Indonesian 25 years or older would have had less than two years of schooling. This increased to four years by 1990 and to eight years by 2015. However, this is still lower than that of Vietnam, Singapore and Thailand.
The 2018 Asian Games in Jakarta and Palembang was the best. However, the Games has to be more than a memory. For the volunteers, thousands of professional staff and the millions of Indonesians whose hearts were filled with pride at the closing ceremony, the Games must offer palpable benefits.
The Indonesian government must accelerate its education reforms, not merely for the Olympics, but for the betterment of its society and its standing in the world order. If you build human capital, the Olympics will come.

Asian Games: South Korea may seek change in controversial military exemption for athletes

South Korea may seek to revise its military exemption programme for athletes amid calls for stricter rules after the country’s soccer and baseball teams earned the reward with gold medals at the Asian Games over the weekend.
Military service is a highly contentious issue in South Korea, where all able-bodied men must complete about 21 months of service as part of efforts to maintain a deterrent against the North.
Exemptions are offered to athletes who win titles at the Asian Games or medals of any colour at the Olympics, however, and Tottenham Hotspur striker Son Heung-min along with his teammates earned that right when they struck gold on Saturday.
Nine baseball players who had not yet completed their service also received the exemption after winning the Asian Games title in Jakarta on Saturday, but they could be among the last athletes to be so rewarded.
Ki Chan-soo, commissioner of the Military Manpower Administration, an arm of the Defence Ministry in charge of conscription, said on Monday that the rule could be amended.
“We’re planning a comprehensive re-examination of the system in the areas of sport and art,” Ki told Yonhap.
“We’re already running short of military personnel resources so we’ll start by looking into whether the exemption programme is fair.”
An official at the conscription agency said that Ki was speaking “in principle” in light of recent media and parliamentary inquiries, and no specific plan for a review had been set up.


The Defence Ministry also said in a statement that it was not considering any change in the system for now but would have intra-agency consultation on the issue.
The incentive was introduced in the 1970s as part of Seoul’s drive to become a world sporting power and raise its profile on the global stage but it has come in for criticism in recent years as the country rebalances its priorities.

Some have called for the exemption system to be abolished altogether, questioning its fairness in an era where the South Korean public have been yearning for an end to privilege and lopsided advantages in all walks of life.
The baseball team was at the centre of the latest controversy as it consisted of top professionals and the national league was put on hold during the Games, while other countries such as Japan and Taiwan sent more amateurs than pros.
Others, though, believe the system fosters athletic excellence and boosts the country’s image.
“I don’t really think it’s unfair ... he is one of the most famous South Korean stars in the world,” Jang Ji-hoon, who is currently serving in the military, said of Son.
“I just hope that he does not go into the service and develops himself during that time instead.”
According to a survey in July by pollster Realmeter, nearly 48 per cent supported scaling up the incentive for athletes, while 44 per cent were opposed.
Ha Tae-keung, an opposition lawmaker, said the programme should also be expanded to include other professions such as K-Pop boy bands.

An artist who takes first or second place in a government-designated international contest can be granted an exemption but the fields eligible for the benefit are largely confined to classical music and dance.
Ha pointed out that the BTS band topped the Billboard 200 albums chart for the second time this year on Sunday with its latest album “Love Yourself: Answer” – an unprecedented feat in K-pop history.

“The programme should be open to other areas but with a higher threshold, say, number one worldwide, not Asia,” Ha said.

Scoring is skyrocketing in high school football. But not against this team. What’s the secret?

Pop quiz: 69-29. 46-39. 56-27.
Are those football or basketball scores?
Believe it or not, those came on the gridiron the past two weeks as defense has all but disappeared from the 5A and 4A Southern Idaho Conferences.
The Treasure Valley’s 19 large-school programs have surrendered an average of 30 points per game to start the season, 4.2 points ahead of last year’s pace after two weeks and 6.1 points more than 2016.
That’s a touchdown more per game for each team, or 12.2 additional points on the scoreboard every night.
It’s no mystery why as spread offenses have flooded the SIC. Every team except Bishop Kelly runs some flavor of the set to weaponize open space, increase the number of snaps and race to test all of the lights on the scoreboard.
But one program cuts against the grain.
Rocky Mountain, the 5A SIC’s top defense a year ago, remains one of the few programs snuffing out all those explosive attacks. The Grizzlies held their first two opponents this fall (Mountain View and Boise) to six points each, limiting both to 200 or fewer yards on the way to a 2-0 start and the state’s No. 2 ranking.
Rocky Mountain runs its own spread attack, but its identity remains centered on defense.
“We’ve always tried to be challenging to the offense,” Rocky Mountain coach Chris Culig said. “I think a lot of defensive coaches want to get lined up and let guys play hard and play fast. We do that as well, but we figure we’ll try to make it hard for the offense to figure out where we’re coming from.”
The Boise performance came as no surprise. The Braves could only score once Rocky sat all of its defensive starters after halftime. But holding the high-flying Mavericks to their lowest point total in 45 games raised eyebrows.
Forget the bend-but-don’t-break mindset many teams use against the spread. Rocky Mountain attacks, deploying its crew of small, fast and athletic defenders to bring pressure from all over the field and force quick decisions. It dictates how the game will be played, then rallies to the ball and pounces on any mistakes.
“They are a pressure team, and so they give you a lot of looks, all kinds of movement. They are bringing guys from all over,” Mountain View coach Judd Benedick said after the loss. “And their kids do a really good job executing it. They are fast and athletic on defense, and their athleticism was better than our bulk tonight.”
Culig knew this season’s defense wouldn’t tip the scales like it had in years past. And as spread offenses utilize small and quick athletes attacking the perimeter, the Grizzlies needed an evolutionary response. So Culig and his coaching staff met with Boise State defensive coordinator Andy Avalos this spring and summer to find different ways to create pressure.
The result is a match coverage defense, which colleges across the country have adopted to blend man and zone coverages, confuse quarterbacks and take back control. The Grizzlies’ 3-3-5 formation allows them to send pressure from all angles without divulging it before the snap. And it puts dynamic senior outside linebackers Joe Strickland (6-3, 190) and Garrett Beck (6-3, 200) closer to the ball where they can wreak havoc.
“I don’t think we’ve seen an offense that’s built old school with power and coming right at you,” Culig said. “... We’ve had to adjust. You’ve got to be able to tackle in space. If you tackle in space well, you’re going to be pretty good.”
The Grizzlies have done that thus far. But they’ll get another test Friday.

Rocky Mountain at Capital, 7 p.m.

Capital brings a no-huddle spread into the matchup, and the Eagles rely on second-year starting quarterback Ryan Hibbs to direct the attack. But Capital coach Todd Simis knows his team has its hands full with Rocky Mountain’s defense.
“You have to be prepared because they’re going to come at you. They are going to come at you from every angle,” Simis said. “Sometimes they’ll overload you (on one side) and they leave a guy uncovered, or he’s covered at the second level. They’re just telling you you’re not going to have time to figure it out.”
Simis said Capital will need to keep Hibbs upright and take advantage of its opportunities when it catches Rocky Mountain out of position on a blitz. That means finding an open receiver and breaking the line of scrimmage in the running game to find a hole vacated by a blitzer.

The Five Different People You'll Meet Playing Intramural Basketball

College is amazing. For many of us, it is undoubtedly the best years of our lives. One of the many reasons college is so amazing is intramural sports. Intramural sports gives us the opportunity to still be physically active, which is really important after the amount of Netflix, pizza, and of-aged beverages consumed the weekend before. Although there are a ton of different sports played, Intramural basketball seems to be the favorite among most people. When you play Intramural basketball, you are going to meet a ton of different people, but these are the five people you are almost certain to meet.

1. The I'm Not Gonna Make It

The I'm not gonna make it person more than likely shows up to the first game. In fact, he/she probably plays really well in their first game. Which makes it even more upsetting when they let you know they won't be there this week. On top of this, their excuses will often be extremely lack-luster. They will more than likely be "studying", hungover, or just too tired to come out and play basketball. This person is the most frustrating because it would be really nice for them to come...and score points.

2. The Player Who Is Too Good

For whatever reason, some people decide to pass on the opportunity on playing college sports, and they decide to attend college for fun. Of course, once they arrive on campus, they sign up for intramural sports. This is when things become no fun whatsoever—unless, of course, this player is on your team. He/she is so much better than everyone else that it would make more sense if they were playing with the college team than with you.

3. The Other-Sport Athlete

Remember that kid from your hometown who was incredible at football? Or maybe someone in your sorority won a few state championships in volleyball? Well, the other-sport athlete is the person who dominated in another sport in their life, but it does not translate in anyway to the basketball court. Basketball is one of those sports that you just have to play in order to develop a knack for the game. These players show flashes of greatness because they are extremely athletic, but more often than not, they look a lot like this bear here. And that's just not good.


4. The Trash Talker

Whether they are talking trash to the other team, to the referee, or making fun of their own team, this player seems incapable to keeping their mouth shut. No matter what happens, they almost always have a sarcastic comment ready and on hand. For the most part, this makes the game interesting. However, in the heat of the moment, this person seems to take things one step too far. Whether it's complaining, whining, or trash talking, there is no clear line in which this person is afraid of. For in fact, he/she has crossed that proverbial line long ago. (I hate to admit it, but I, apologetically, accept the fact that this is me.)

5. The Player Who Never Subs Out

Some people like to get others involved. Other people, like to get themselves involved. Whether or not they are the best player on the court is irrelevant to them. They don't like coming out of the game, and frankly, they won't. As you stand up from the bench and ask if anyone needs one, you will find this person talking to the referee or fetching the ball. Or worse, they just look at you and say, "Nah." Somehow, someway, this person manages to avoid coming out of the game until they finally decide with two minutes left, that they need a sub.